PARVEEN SINGH Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB
LAWS(P&H)-2011-3-641
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Decided on March 29,2011

Parveen Singh Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF PUNJAB Respondents

JUDGEMENT

Rajan Gupta, J. - (1.) THIS is a petition filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking pre -arrest bail in a case registered against the Petitioner vide FIR No. 9 dated 07.01.2011 under Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 and 120 -B IPC at Police Station Navi Baradari, Jalandhar.
(2.) LEARNED Counsel for the Petitioner has argued that Petitioner was just an employee of the Society and was abiding by the directions given by it. He submits that he had no role to play in the commission of crime and deserves the concession of pre -arrest bail. Learned State Counsel has opposed the prayer. He has referred to letter dated 04.05.2006, Annexure P -2 and submits that Petitioner entered into agreement to sell regarding the plot in question with Jaswinder Kaur on a date prior thereto i.e. in May, 2005. He submits that Petitioner himself sold the plot belonging to Gurcharan Singh to Jaswinder Kaur without any authority.
(3.) I have heard learned Counsel for the parties.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.