JUDGEMENT
Ram Chand Gupta, J. -
(1.) THE present revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure for setting aside orders dated 17.1.2009 and 12.12.2009 (Annexures P -3 & P -4 respectively) passed by learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Sonepat and order dated 30.9.2010 (Annexure P -5) passed by learned Additional District Judge, Sonepat.
(2.) I have heard learned Counsel for the parties and have gone through the whole record carefully including the impugned orders passed by learned trial court as well as the first appellate court. It has been contended by learned Counsel for the Petitioner that objection petition filed by the Petitioner has not been decided so far and however, warrant of possession was issued.
(3.) THIS Court while issuing notice of motion on 26.10.2010 passed the following order:
Heard.
It has been submitted by the learned Counsel for the Petitioner that the objection petition filed by the Petitioner has still not been decided by the executing court and that he had a good cause for not appearing when the objection petition was called.
Even if the ex -party proceedings have not been set aside against the Petitioner, he could have joined the proceedings at any stage and as such the executing court was required to decide the objection petition.
Notice of motion for 9.12.2010.
In the meanwhile, the warrant of possession shall not be executed in respect of the plot of the Petitioner bearing Plot No. 168.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.