JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) This order shall dispose of CWP Nos. 1771 and 1772 of
2011, which have been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution
challenging orders dated 7.4.2010 and 19.11.2009 respectively,
passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench,
Chandigarh (for brevity, the Tribunal ). The Tribunal has held that
the original applicant-respondent(s) are entitled to facilities of the
Central Government Health Scheme on usual payment of
subscription fee at par with other Central Government pensioners
for one year, which is extendable on yearly basis. In that regard
Tribunal has followed the earlier decisions rendered in OA Nos.
955/CH/2003, 217/HR/2004, 833/CH/2005 and 69/PB/2010.
(2.) Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) has fairly conceded
that the view taken by the Tribunal earlier and the one taken in the
impugned orders has attained finality and either such orders have
not been challenged further or the writ petitions challenging such
orders have been dismissed.
(3.) Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner(s), we
are of the view that no interference is called for in the order passed
by the Tribunal. Moreover, the relief has been granted only for a
period of one year extendable on yearly basis till outcome of the
writ petition pending in the High Court of Karnataka. Accordingly,
we do not find any ground to admit these petitions. Similar view
has been taken by a Division Bench of this Court in the case of
Union of India and others v. Central Administrative Tribunal and
others (CWP No. 21622 of 2010, decided on 6.12.2010).;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.