JUDGEMENT
K.C. Puri, J. -
(1.) THE case of the petitioners is that they are major and have contracted marriage on 4.10.2011. The marriage certificate and photographs evidencing marriage have been placed on the file. It is alleged that they apprehend danger from respondents No. 4 and 5. To seek redressal of their grievance, they have submitted representation dated 4.10.2011 ( Annexure P -6) to the Commissioner of Police, Amritsar.
(2.) NOTICE of motion to Advocate General, Punjab. On the asking of the Court, Ms. Bhavna Gupta, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, who is present in Court, accepts notice. Without commenting on the age of the petitioners and validity of the marriage, directions are given to the Commissioner of Police, Amritsar, to decide the representation of the petitioners (Annexure P -6) within one month from today, keeping in view the threat perception to the petitioners.
(3.) HOWEVER , it is made clear that in case any criminal case is pending against the petitioners, this order shall not debar the respondents to proceed with.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.