RAJ KUMAR Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB
LAWS(P&H)-2011-12-227
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Decided on December 07,2011

RAJ KUMAR Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF PUNJAB Respondents

JUDGEMENT

Laxmi Narain Mittal, J. - (1.) ACCUSED Raj Kumar has filed this petition for anticipatory bail in case FIR No.87 dated 19.10.2011, under Sections 452, 354, 509 and 323 of the Indian Penal Code (in short - IPC), registered at Police Station Mehitana, District Hoshiarpur.
(2.) I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case file. According to prosecution version, the petitioner trespassed into the house of his brother's wife (complainant) and outraged her modesty and caused injuries to her.
(3.) LEARNED State counsel, on instructions from ASI Santokh Singh, submitted that offence under Section 325 IPC has also been added as the complainant suffered grievous hurt also in the occurrence. It is also stated by learned State counsel that even petitioner's mother is witness of the occurrence and her statement under Section 161 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been recorded during investigation.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.