JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) The petitioner, in this Civil Writ Petition, seeks quashing of
the notice dated 08.12.2009 (Annexure P5) issued by
respondent No.4-Bank in purported exercise of its powers
under Section 13(2) of the Securitisation and
Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of
Security Interest Act, 2002 (in short, 'the Act'). The
petitioner also seeks quashing of the application (Annexure
P9) under Section 14 of the Act moved by the Bank before
the District Magistrate, Sangrur as well as the notice dated
07.05.2010 (Annexure P10) passed thereupon.
(2.) The admitted facts, in exordium, are that the petitionerCompany availed the Cash Credit Limit facility from
respondent No.4-Bank to the extent of Rs.60 lacs followed
by another ad hoc limit of Rs.15 lacs and to secure the
aforesaid credit facilities, two residential properties have
been exclusively mortgaged in favour of respondent No.4-
Canara Bank. The petitioner-Company has also secured a
Term Loan from the Punjab Financial Corporation (in
short, 'the PFC') by way of joint mortgage of a separate
property, namely, the factory premises; the land
underneath as also the plant and machineries in favour of
the PFC and the respondent-Bank. The PFC has the first
charge whereas respondent No.4-Bank has the second
charge on the properties jointly mortgaged. There are,
thus, two sets of mortgaged properties, namely, the two
residential houses which are exclusively mortgaged in
favour of respondent No.4-Bank, and the other properties
viz. the plant and machineries; the factory building and the
land underneath jointly mortgaged in favour of the PFC
and respondent No.4-Bank.
(3.) Due to the petitioner's failure to discharge its loan liability,
its account was classified as Non-Performing Assets (NPA)
on 01.07.2005 with the balance outstanding recoverable
from the petitioner has now increased from Rs.78 lacs to
Rs.169 lacs.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.