JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) The complaint was filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable
Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') against the
petitioner/accused, Gurdev Singh, as sole proprietor of M/s Gurdev
Pesticides, by M/s Punjab Agricultural Traders, through its sole proprietor
Inder Singh, complainant/respondent. As per the contents of that complaint,
both the parties are dealing in the purchase and sale of pesticides. The
accused purchased pesticides from the complainant and in discharge of his
liability he issued cheque No.821/CA/12/681554 dated 20.5.1997 for
Rs.50,000/- drawn on Indian Overseas Bank, Branch Ferozepur City. When
that cheque was presented to his banker by way of collection, through the
banker of the complainant, the same was dishonoured, vide memo dated
20.5.1997 on account of 'insufficient funds' in the account of the accused.
(2.) The complainant approached the accused and disclosed that fact, who
assured him that there would be sufficient funds in his account and that he
should present the cheque again on 13.6.1997. On that assurance of the
accused, the complainant again presented the cheque for collection through
his own banker on 13.6.1997, but the same was again dishonoured on
account of' insufficient funds' in the account of the accused. He approached
the accused with the request to make the payment of the cheque amount but
he paid no heed. Then he served notice dated 28.6.1997 through his counsel
and still that amount was not paid. On the basis of the preliminary evidence
produced by the complainant, the JMIC, Ferozepur found sufficient grounds
for proceeding against the accused under Section 138 of the Act. He was
summoned accordingly. On his appearance before the trial court, notice of
that offence was given to him, to which he pleaded not guilty and claimed
trial. To prove his guilt, the complainant examined himself as CW 3,
R.K.Dhawan,Clerk-cum-Cashier (CW 1) and Naresh Kashayap, Clerk (CW
2). After the complainant closed his evidence, the accused was examined by
the trial court and his statement was recorded under Section 313 of the Code
of Criminal Procedure. All the incriminating circumstances appearing
against him in the evidence of the complaint were put to him in order to
enable him to explain the same. He did not deny all those incriminating
circumstances. He admitted that the cheque was presented to his banker for
payment and the same was dishonoured and that after he was told about
dishonouring of cheque he assured the complainant to present the same
again to his banker and that he would deposit the amount of the cheque in
his account, and that when the cheque was presented second time the same
was again dishonoured on account of insufficient funds in his account.
(3.) While denying the other circumstances, first he pleaded that he is not having
an account in Indian Overseas Bank, Ferozepur and that he never issued
cheque Ex.C-1 and then he changed his plea and stated that he had given the
cash amount of the cheque to the complainant. He was called upon to enter
on his defence and thereafter with the permission of the court he appeared
as his own witness as DW 1. After going through the evidence and hearing
both the sides, the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ferozepur, vide his judgment
dated 1.4.2003, convicted the accused for the offence under Section 138 of
the Act and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of
one year and to pay a fine of Rs.3,000/- and in default thereof to further
undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one month. The accused
preferred an appeal against that conviction and sentence, which was
dismissed by the Additional Sessions Judge Ferozepur, vide his judgment
dated 13.12.2005. Now the present revision has been preferred against that
conviction and sentence.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.