Augustine George Masih, J. - (1.) THESE applications have been filed by the applicants -Appellants Kalawati and Om Parkash praying for suspension of sentence during the pendency of the appeal.
(2.) COUNSEL for the applicants -Appellants submits that as regards Om Parkash, the allegations against him is that he had provoked his co -accused to open fire towards the complainant and Kalawati has been alleged to have armed with Danda and she gave a blow on the forehead of the complainant. He contends that as a matter of fact, no firearm was used during the occurrence and the injury which has been attributed to Kalawati on the forehead of Bhoop Singh has been found to be simple in nature. They have been convicted and sentenced by the aid of Section 149 IPC for five years and Om Parkash has undergone more than one year of sentence whereas Kalawati has undergone more than 10 months. He contends that in the light of the role attributed to the applicants -Appellants and keeping in view the fact that appeal is not likely to be heard soon, their prayer for suspension of sentence be granted. On the other hand, counsel for the State and the complainant do not rebut the contention as has been raised by the counsel for the Appellants, however, it has been stated that since they had with unlawful assembly, caused the injuries on the person of the complainant, therefore, the concession as prayed for be not granted to them.
(3.) I have heard counsel for the parties and gone through the record of the case.;