DULI CHAND Vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR.
LAWS(P&H)-2011-3-623
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Decided on March 25,2011

DULI CHAND Appellant
VERSUS
State of Haryana and Anr. Respondents

JUDGEMENT

Hemant Gupta, J. - (1.) THE Petitioner has invoked the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 11 (6) & (8) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short 'the Act') for appointment of an Arbitrator in respect of the disputes between the parties arising out an Agreement dated 14.01.2005. Vide the aforesaid Agreement, the Petitioner was allotted work of "Providing/Construction of One Nos 16 Passenger Lift for litigants and lawyers in the judicial complex, Section 12, Faridabad".
(2.) THE Petitioner has completed the work allotted in the month of December 2007. The claim of the Petitioner for certain amount was denied. The Petitioner, thereafter, sought appointment of an Arbitrator in terms of Clause 25 -A of the Agreement. Since the Arbitrator was not appointed, the Petitioner has invoked the jurisdiction of this Court. In reply, the Respondents have inter alia stated that the Petitioner has not made any request to the competent authority i.e. Engineer -in -Chief, Haryana, Public Health Engineering Department, Panchkula for appointment of an Arbitrator and that the Petitioner has not deposited the security required in terms of Sub -clause 7 of Clause 25 -A of the Agreement.
(3.) DURING the course of arguments, learned Counsel for the Respondents stated that on deposit of security amount by the Petitioner, the Respondents shall appoint an Arbitrator in terms of Clause 25 -A of the Agreement.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.