AKHTAR HUSSAIN Vs. STATE OF HARYANA
LAWS(P&H)-2011-5-370
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Decided on May 03,2011

AKHTAR HUSSAIN Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF HARYANA Respondents

JUDGEMENT

Nawab Singh J. - (1.) By this petition, under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, Akhtar Hussain-petitioner seeks quashing of First Information Report No. 53 dated October 18th, 2007 under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (for short 'the Act').
(2.) Prosecution was launched on the statement of Jagat Singh. He filed complaint in Police Station State Vigilance Bureau, Faridabad on October 18th, 2007 stating that petitioner demanded illegal gratification of Rs. 60,000/- from him for giving him cheque of loan amount of Rs. 2,67,000/- issued by Primary Cooperative Agriculture and Rural Development Bank, Ballabgarh (for short 'the Cooperative Bank'). The petitioner was working as Land Valuation Officer in the Bank. On the complaint of Jagat Singh, a raiding party consisting of Ramesh Pal, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Naib Tehsildar Ballabgarh and Rambir Singh an independent witness was formed. The currency notes worth Rs. 60,000/- were initialed by the aforesaid officers. The said amount was paid by Jagat Singh to the petitioner and immediately on raid, the amount was recovered from the petitioner. Hence, the First Information Report was lodged against him after obtaining sanction from the competent authority viz. Managing Director, Haryana State Agriculture and Rural Development Bank.
(3.) The solitary submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner being an employee of the Bank was not 'public servant' and as such, he could not be prosecuted under Section 13(1)(d) of the Act. To support the contention, he has relied upon Government of Andhra Pradesh v. P. Venku Reddy, 2002(4) RCR (Criminal) 557 .;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.