BHARAT BHUSHAN GOYAL AND ANR. Vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR.
LAWS(P&H)-2011-9-181
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Decided on September 09,2011

Bharat Bhushan Goyal And Anr. Appellant
VERSUS
State of Haryana and Anr. Respondents

JUDGEMENT

Ajai Lamba, J. - (1.) THIS petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 prays for quashing of FIR No. 243 dated 16.11.2010 under Sections 420, 406 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, registered at Police Station Mandi Gobindgarh, District Fatehgarh Sahib, on the basis of compromise deed, placed on record as Annexure P -2.
(2.) LEARNED Counsel appearing for the Petitioners contends that a monitory dispute arose between Respondent No. 2 and the Petitioners. That dispute has been settled by way of compromise. The entire amount due towards Respondent No. 2 has been paid by the Petitioners as is recorded in compromise deed Annexure P -2. Raj Kumar son of Shankar Das, as identified by Head Constable Jaswant Singh, present in Court, states that indeed he has received the entire money and therefore, he does not want to pursue the FIR against the Petitioners. Raj Kumar also prays for quashing of the FIR and subsequent proceedings.
(3.) LEARNED State counsel states that because the dispute has been settled by way of compromise, quashing of the FIR is not opposed.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.