JUDGEMENT
RAKESH KUMAR GARG,J. -
(1.) THIS judgment will dispose of 9 writ petitions i.e. CWP Nos. 12360,
12292, 13801, 10034, 13949, 15667, 13507, 13802 and 16570 of 2010 which have arisen out of acquisition proceedings for land measuring 192.75
acres initiated by the respondents for the lands in question vide
notification No. 6/19/2009/6HG-I/2224 dated 10.8.2009 issued under
Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as
the 'Act') for a public purpose, namely, for development of missing
linkII (from Dhandra road to Sidhwan Canal via Malerkotla Road), Ludhiana
and notification No. 6/20/2009-6HG-4/2230 dated 10.8.2009 for a public
purpose, namely, for development of residential urban estate along
proposed road from Dhandra road to Sidhwan Canal via Malerkotla Road,
Ludhiana mainly to adjust oustees of above said road for land measuring
59 acres 1 kanal 12 marlas. CWP Nos. 12360, 13802, 15667, 13949, 10034 of 2010 relates to acquisition of an area measuring 192.75 acres of land for development of Missing Link-II whereas CWP Nos. 16570, 13507, 12292,
13801 of 2010 pertain to development of Urban Estate for oustees. Further challenge has also been laid to notification issued under Section 6 of
the Act on 8.2.2010 and the award No. 4 of 2010 dated 7.8.2010 in the
cases known as Missing Link-II and notification issued under Section 6 of
the Act on 8.2.2010 and award No. 3 of 2010 dated 7.8.2010 in the cases
pertaining to Urban Estate for oustees.
(2.) WITH the consent of the parties, all these cases were ordered to be heard together. The arguments were heard in CWP Nos. 12360 and 12292 of
2010 and were treated to be the lead cases in each category.
As per the averments made in the writ petitions, the petitioners are owners of agricultural land, which has been duly shown in the revenue
record. They are cultivating the land for years together and the
principal source of their livelihood is agriculture. Respondent No. 1
issued notification (Annexure P-1) attached with CWP No. 12360 of 2010
under section 4 of the Act for acquiring land measuring 192.75 acres for
a public purpose, namely, Missing Link-II for development (from Dhandra
road to Sidhwan Canal via Malerkotla Road), Ludhiana. In pursuance of the
notification, the petitioners/land owners submitted their objections
under Section 5-A of the Act which were dismissed by a non-speaking order
and no opportunity of hearing was given to the petitioners. Thereafter,
notification under Section 6 (Annexure P-4) attached with CWP No. 12360
of 2010 was issued making a declaration that land of the petitioners was
acquired.
(3.) CHALLENGING the aforesaid acquisition proceedings, it has been averred in the writ petition that the land has been acquired without taking out
survey of the area sought to be acquired and without taking into
consideration the objections filed by the petitioners. The
respondent-State had already acquired land for the purpose of a Bye Pass
which is four lane dual carriage way. Proposed acquired land for the road
passes through many residential houses and before framing the scheme for
acquisition, it was not taken into consideration that the petitioners as
well as other people, who are running their industries and commercial
establishments from their respective premises, had spent huge expenditure
for its construction and it will cause immense loss to them and the
petitioners have no source of income other than the income from growth of
agricultural land. Moreover, the proposed scheme for acquisition is
vague. The proposed road goes in a jig jag manner as its width at some
places is wide whereas the land belonging to the influential persons has
been left out and the width at such places is narrow and therefore,
different yard sticks have been adopted by the respondents under the
political influence. An objection has also been raised that no Master
Plan/Zonal Plan has been framed and in fact, the whole exercise to
acquire the land for the alleged road terming it as 'Missing Link' is
nothing but abuse of power at the behest of builders. In fact, the
proposed Missing Link is a redundant project and it is sought to be
revived by the respondents for 'mala fide' reasons at the behest of the
powerful lobby of colonizers. The proposed 'Missing Link', which was
envisaged in the year 1998, was not considered feasible and it was
recommended that the same will not serve any useful purpose and in fact,
the Government had accepted the proposal and the scheme was dropped on
26.2.2008. Further objection has been raised in the writ petition that no Master Plan is made in accordance with the provisions of the Punjab
Regional Town Planning and Development Act, 1995 (in short the 'Punjab
Act') and thus, the acquisition of the land was against the provisions of
the Punjab Act and was liable to be quashed.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.