JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Both the courts below have dismissed the suit of the
plaintiff/appellants (now represented by his legal representatives)
(hereinafter referred to as the plaintiffs); hence this regular second
appeal.
(2.) The case pertains to a flagrant trauma, misuse of the
courts by way of bringing law suits by distorting the facts in order to
avoid previous judgments passed against them.
(3.) Hazara Singh, plaintiff had filed a suit for declaration
against the defendants alleging that Joginder Singh, Amar Singh
and Gurbant Singh sons of Makhan Singh, now defendants Nos. 1 to
3 had 1/4
th
share in the land measuring 79 kanals 10 marlas out of
which, the land measuring 87 kanals 11 marlas, as fully detailed in
the head-note (a) of the plaint and they have no concern with the
remaining land either of sub head (a) or (b) and they are not entitled
to get the land partitioned on the basis of the mutation wrongly
sanctioned in their names. Plaintiff and defendant Nos. 1 to 7 are
recorded to be the owners of the land as per copy of jamabandi for
the year 1980-81.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.