JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) This application is filed by the respondent against whom
the petitioners have filed this writ petition. The issue involved is for
recovery of sum of '7,000/- odd. The prayer made in the application
is that the respondent would not have any objection if the writ petition
filed by the petitioners is allowed. The reason for this is that the retiral
benefits of the respondent have been withheld for this minor
recovery.
(2.) Notice of this application is given to the nonapplicants/
counsel for the petitioners. Mr.Anil Rathee, Advocate
appears. Obviously, the counsel for the petitioners would not have
any objection if the writ petition is allowed.
(3.) In view of the position as noted above, the main writ
petition is taken up for hearing and the same is allowed. Order,
Annexure P-13, is quashed with necessary consequences to follow.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.