JUDGEMENT
AJAI LAMBA, J. -
(1.) THIS civil writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the
Constitution of India prays for issuance of a writ in the nature of
certiorari quashing order Annexure P-5 dated 23.07.2009 passed by
Superintending Canal Officer, Hisar whereby, revision petition filed by
respondent No. 3 has been accepted and order of Divisional Canal Officer
Annexure P-4 has been set aside.
(2.) THE facts in brief are that the petitioner claims that watercourse A B C D and E F has been in existence for 40 years. Warabandi has been
sanctioned since the year 1964. The respondent No. 3 purchased land from
Hemraj son of Ditta Ram and Sunil son of Hem Raj in the year 2007. For
their own personal convenience, the watercourse at the said points has
been demolished. Accordingly, the petitioner filed an application tinder
Section 24 of the Haryana Canal and Drainage Act, 1974 (for short 'The
Act') praying for restoration of the watercourse that had been demolished
by respondent No. 3. Facts further indicate that vide order Annexure P-1
passed by Sub Divisional Canal Officer, Ghaggar Water Services, Tohana,
it has been directed that watercourse A B C D and E F be restored. A
positive finding has been returned that the said watercourse had been
dismantled and irrigation to the land of the petitioner had been stopped.
It seems that aggrieved by the order, the respondent filed appeal before Divisional Canal Officer. The Divisional Canal Officer, vide order
Annexure P-2, dismissed the appeal and upheld the order passed by Sub
Divisional Canal Officer.
(3.) THE respondent filed a revision petition before the Superintending Canal Officer purportedly under Section 2 of the Act. Vide order Annexure
P-3, the Superintending Canal Officer remanded the matter back to
Divisional Canal Officer to reconsider the matter in the light of present
irrigation of the area. It has been observed that there were 6
shareholders of the watercourse, however, the others had not come forward
to challenge the action of the respondents in dismantling the watercourse
and, therefore, investigation is required.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.