COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., CHANDIGARH-I Vs. PUNJAB TRACTORS LTD. (SCD)
LAWS(P&H)-2001-10-123
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Decided on October 15,2001

Commissioner Of C. Ex., Chandigarh -I Appellant
VERSUS
Punjab Tractors Ltd. (Scd) Respondents

JUDGEMENT

J.L. Gupta, J. - (1.) M /s. Punjab Tractors Ltd. is engaged in the manufacture of Fork Lift Trucks. It claimed Modvat credit on certain parts used for the manufacture of the said trucks. Vide order dated October 3,1998, a copy of which is at Annexure P -l with the petition, the Assistant Commissioner had disallowed the credit for an amount of Rs. 2,10,446/ -. It was held that the benefit was not admissible as the parts fell under Item 8708. Aggrieved by the order, the respondent - company filed an appeal. It was allowed by the Commissioner vide order dated November 12, 1998. It was held that there was no "logic in the argument.......that the parts falling under 8708.00 cannot be taken as inputs for the final product for Fork Lift Trucks. No evidence has been brought on record by the department that these parts are not actually being used in the manufacture of Fork Lift Trucks."
(2.) AGGRIEVED by the order of the Appellate Authority, the Revenue filed an appeal. This was dismissed by the Tribunal vide its order dated July 6 2000, 2001 (137) E.L.T. 247 . A copy of this order is at Annexure P -3 with the petition. Aggrieved by the order of the Appellate Authority and the Tribunal, the Revenue has filed the present petition under Section 35H(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. It maintains that the following question of law arises for the opinion of this Court : - "Whether Modvat credit under Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 (hereinafter referred to as the Rules) is admissible on the parts and accessories falling under Chapter sub -heading No. 8708.00 when used in or in relation to the manufacture of Fork Lift Trucks falling under Chapter Sub -heading No. 8427.00 as it has been clearly mentioned under Chapter Sub -heading No. 8708.00 that it covers "Parts and accessories" of the Motor Vehicles of Chapter headings "87.01 to 87 -05 only."
(3.) WE have heard Mr. Kamal Sehgal, learned Counsel for the petitioner. He contends that the parts for which Modvat credit had been claimed by the respondents fall within Tariff Item 8708 and not under Item 8431.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.