CHANDIGARH HOUSING BOARD Vs. UNION OF INDIA
LAWS(P&H)-2001-9-24
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Decided on September 07,2001

CHANDIGARH HOUSING BOARD Appellant
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA Respondents

JUDGEMENT

JAWAHAR LAL GUPTA, J. - (1.) IS the action of the Revenue in calling upon the petitioners in these two cases to file their returns of income under the provisions of the IT Act, 1961, illegal ? Are the notices issued to the petitioners liable to be quashed ? These are the two questions that arise for consideration.
(2.) IN CWP No. 9572 of 2001, the Chandigarh Housing Board is the petitioner. On 29th Jan., 2001, the petitioner was served with a notice under S. 142(1) of the IT Act, 1961. It was asked to file its return of income for the asst. year 2000 -2001. A copy of the notice dt. 29th Jan., 2001, is at Annexure P.4. The petitioner sent its reply vide letter dt. 15th Feb., 2001. On 23rd March, 2001, the Dy. CIT (TDS) respondent No. 3 issued notice to the various banks directing them to deduct TDS on the deposits made by the petitioner. A copy of this notice is at Annexure P -9. On 18th June, 2001, the petitioner was served with another notice, a copy of which is at Annexure P.7. It was called upon to show cause as to why an order imposing a penalty should not be passed under s. 271(1)(b). Aggrieved by these notices, the petitioner has approached this Court through the present writ petition. The petitioner alleges that the provisions of the Haryana Housing Board Act, 1971, were extended to the Union Territory of Chandigarh vide Notification dt. 14th Jan., 1975. Thereafter, the petitioner was incorporated under the Act. In view of the provision of S. 10(20A), its income is exempt from levy of tax. Thus, it cannot be called upon to file any return of income. On this basis, the petitioner prays that the notices dt. 29th Jan., 2001, 23rd March, 2001 and 18th June, 2001, copies of which have been produced as Annexures P.4, P.9 and P.7 respectively, be quashed.
(3.) THE second petition has been filed by the Punjab Urban Development Authority. It is aggrieved by the notices dt. 12th Jan., 2001, 23rd April, 2001, and 13th June, 2001, copies of which have been produced as Annexures P.2, P.4 and P.5 respectively. It prays that these notices be quashed.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.