SURINDER PAUL SALAG RAM Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB PUNJAB CHANDIGARH
LAWS(P&H)-2001-10-8
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Decided on October 08,2001

SURINDER PAUL, SON OF SALAG RAM Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF PUNJAB, PUNJAB, CHANDIGARH Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) In this writ petition under Arts. 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks modification of the award, dated October 26, 1983, passed by the Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Ludhiana wherein while reinstating the workman with continuity of service, he has been denied the back wages.
(2.) The petitioner was employed as a conductor with the Punjab Roadways from September 3, 1969. He was placed under suspension while he was working at Ludhiana depot. He was subsequently reinstated. The petitioner was issued a charge sheet on December 3, 1975, which is as follows: "On July 25, 1975, while you were on duty with bus No.3427 on Ludhiana Nawanshehr via Rahon route, it was checked by the Central Flying Squad at Nehru Gate Nawan-Shehr. On checking, it was found that you had collected the fare money from a few passengers and issued no tickets to them. Thus, you had pocketed the Government money to the tune of Rs. 16.55 and misbehaved with the checking staff. Your conduct was found unsatisfactory while on duty."
(3.) On the basis of the enquiry report, the services of the petitioner were terminated by order, dated December 1, 1980. He filed an appeal to the Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Ludhiana, but the same was dismissed. The petitioner served a demand notice on respondent Nos. 3 and 4. After failure of the conciliation proceedings, the matter was referred to the Labour Court for adjudication of the reference under Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The reference is as follows: "Whether termination of services of Sri Surinder Paul, workman is justified and in order? If not, to what relief/exact amount of compensation is he entitled.";


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.