COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs. RAM NIWAS SHARMA
LAWS(P&H)-2001-7-10
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Decided on July 05,2001

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Appellant
VERSUS
RAM NIWAS SHARMA Respondents

JUDGEMENT

JAWAHAR LAL GUPTA, J. - (1.) THE respondent-assessee is working as a Development Officer in the life Insurance Corporation. He filed a return declaring an income of Rs. 68,420. The assessee disclosed that he had received an incentive bonus amounting to Rs. 58,320. He claimed deduction at 40 per cent on account of expenses under S. 16(i) of the IT Act, 1961. The AO proceeded under S. 143(1)(a) and allowed deduction of Rs. 23,328. The assessee filed an application under S. 154 of the IT Act, 1961. It was rejected vide order dt. 26th July, 1994. The assessee filed an appeal. It was accepted by the CIT (A). The Revenue filed an appeal before the Tribunal. The appeal was dismissed on the ground that the addition could have been made only after giving a notice under S. 143(2) of the Act. Since no notice had been given to the assessee, the appeal was dismissed. The petition for reference having been dismissed by the Tribunal, it has filed the present petition with the prayer that the Tribunal be directed to refer the following question for the consideration of this Court : "Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Hon'ble Tribunal was right in law in holding that adjustment made in respect of incentive bonus on the basis of documents accompanying the return was outside the scope of S. 143(1)(a) of the IT Act, 1961, and could have been made only after issue of notice under S. 143(2)?"
(2.) WE have heard Mr. R.P. Sawhney, learned counsel for the Revenue. He contends that the assessing authority had proceeded under the provisions of S. 143(1)(a) of the IT Act, 1961. As such, no notice was required to be given to the assessee. After hearing the learned counsel, we are of the opinion that in the absence of an opportunity to the assessee, the ITO could not have declined his request for deduction. The decision of the authority was ex parte. It has been rightly reversed by the Tribunal on the ground that notice under S. 143(2) should have been given. We find no ground to interfere. The petition is, accordingly, dismissed.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.