SURAJ MAL HOODA Vs. STATE OF HARYANA
LAWS(P&H)-1990-2-86
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Decided on February 14,1990

Suraj Mal Hooda Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF HARYANA Respondents

JUDGEMENT

K.P. Bhandari, J. - (1.) This Writ petition came up for hearing on February 14, 1990. After hearing the parties' counsel, I allowed the writ petition, quashed the order of compulsory retirement and issued necessary direction for reinstatement and grant of consequential benefits to the petitioner. It was stated in the order that detailed reasons will follow. Now I proceed to give reasons in support of my order dated February 14,1990.
(2.) The petitioner is aggrieved of his order of compulsory retirement passed against him by the Haryana Government on attaining the age of 55 years. The order of compulsory retirement, Annexure P/1 reads as follows:- "Whereas the Governor of Haryana is of the opinion that it is in the public interest to retire Shri Suraj Mai Hooda Carcass Leather Marketing Officer, Industries Department, from service after attaining the age of 55 years by giving him three months' notice,
(3.) Now therefore in pursuance of the provisions contained in rule 5.32 (c) of the Punjab Civil Services Rules, Volume-II and Rule 3.26 of the Punjab Civil Services Rule, Volume-I, Part-I, as applicable to the State of Haryana the Governor of Haryana in the Public interest, hereby orders that Shri Suraj Mai Hooda, Carcass Leather Marketing Officer shall stand retired from service under the State Government of Haryana on the expiry of three months from the date of receipt of the order by him.";


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.