GUNWANT RAJ Vs. MADHU SHARMA
LAWS(P&H)-1990-12-52
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Decided on December 14,1990

Gunwant Raj Appellant
VERSUS
MADHU SHARMA Respondents

JUDGEMENT

S.S.GREWAL,J - (1.) THIS petition i.e. Cri. Misc. No. 8243-M of 1989 the Gunwant Raj and others Versus Madhu Sharma, filed under section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, relates to quashment of complaint (Annexure P-1) as well as subsequent proceedings including the summoning order dated 18.7.1989, passed by Shri R.P. Nagrath, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Pathankot. In this petition, Gunwant Raj petitioner No. 1 is the husband, Gopal Dass and Raj Rani, petitioners No. 2 and 3, are the parents-in-law, Kamlesh Kumari and Prem Lata petitioners No. 4 and 5 are the sisters-in-law, and Pushkar Raj is brother-in-law, of Madhu Sharma, respondent.
(2.) CRI . Misc. No. 4953-M of 1990, re : Jagat Singh Versus Smt. Balbir Kaur has been filed by Jagat Singh father-in-law of Smt. Balbir Kaur complainant, for quashment of complaint dated 24-5-1988 (Annexure P-1) filed by her against him and his other relations under sections 4 and 6 of Dowry Prohibition Act, read with section 405 IPC as well as the summoning order dated 30-11-1988 (Annnexure P-2) passed by the Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Jalandhar, whereby the present petitioner as well as Kulwinder Singh his son and husband of the complainant, were summoned under section 406 IPC. Cri. Misc. No 1431-M of 1989 re : Jathedar Kirpal Singh and another v. Smt. Jaswinder Kaur, relates to quashment of complaint (Annexure P-2) filed by Jaswinder Kaur against her husband Gurdip Singh, her parents-in-law Jathedar Kirpal Singh and Smt. Nirmal Kaur (the present petitioners), Shamsher Singh her brother-in-law, Karamvir Kaur her sister-in-law and Bhupinder Kaur her husband's brother's wife, under sections 406 and 498-A IPC as well as the order of Additional Sessions Judge, Patiala dated 27-1-1989 (Annexure P-4) whereby the order of the trial Magistrate dated 4-8-1988 (Annexure P-3) for summoning the present petitioners as well as their son Gurdip Singh under sections 406 and 498-A of the Indian Penal Code, was maintained.
(3.) AS common questions of law are involved all these three cases shall be disposed of by one judgment.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.