JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Notice to the State
of Punjab.
On the asking of the Court Mrs. S.K.
Bhatia, DAG, Punjab accepts the notice.
Petitioners Avtar Singh and Mander Singh
are seeking quashment of the challan
submitted by the State under Section 3 of
the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled
Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1987.
It may be mentioned here that both the
petitioners are being prosecuted under
Sections 376, 452 and 506 IPC and the
offence has been registered against
them in Police Station Raman, District
Bathinda for allegedly committing rape upon
Rani, who belongs to scheduled caste
community.
(2.) The learned Counsel for the
petitioners submits that the challan has been
directedly presented in the special Court
which is a Court of Session and in these
circumstances, being a Court of Session, the
special Court could not take the cognizance
directly unless the challan is committed to it
by the Area Magistrate. In support of his
contention, he relies upon Gangula Ashok
and another v. State of A.P., 2000 (1) RCR
(Crl.) 797 (SC) = 2000 (1) All India Crl. LR
578, a judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme
Court, where it has been observed as
follows:
"9. Thus the Court of Session is specified
to conduct a trial and no other Court can
conduct the trial of offences under the
Act. Why the Parliament provided that
only a Court of Session can be specified
as a Special Court? Evidently the
Legislature wanted the Special Court to
be Court of Session. Hence, the particular
Court of Session, even after being
specified as a Special Court, would
continue to be essentially a Court of
Session and designation of it as a Special
Court would not denude it of its character
or even powers as a Court of Session.
The trial in such a Court can be conducted
only in the manner provided in Chapter
XVIII of the Code which contains a
fasciculus of provisions for "Trial before
a Court of Session".
(3.) In this view of the matter, the
prosecution could not produce the challan
directly to the Court of Session. It was
supposed to be presented before the
Magistrate.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.