JUDGEMENT
K.R.MOHAPATRA,J. -
(1.) These intra-Court appeals have been filed assailing the common order dated 16.07.2016 (Annexure-1) passed by learned
Single Judge in W.P.(C) No.9003 of 2015 and similar other writ
applications heard and disposed of analogously.
For the sake of convenience of discussion and adjudication,
we take up Writ Appeal No.372 of 2016 arising out of W.P.(C) No. 9003 of
2015 as the lead case and dispose of these appeals by a common judgment.
(2.) The appellant in the aforesaid writ appeal is an Assistant Teacher in Sankata Tarini High School, Melan in the district of Keonjhar.
The appellant is an untrained graduate and has been appointed against
a trained graduate post. Teachers similarly placed as that of the
appellant undertake B.Ed. course as in-service candidates for their
substantive appointment and approval of their services as a Trained
Graduate Teacher. Each year, the Directorate of Teacher Education and
S.C.E.R.T., Odisha, Bhubaneswar publishes advertisement inviting
applications from the candidates (both direct and in-service) seeking
admission to different teachers training courses including B.Ed.
Likewise, an advertisement was published by the Director of T.E. &
S.C.E.R.T., Odisha, Bhubaneswar-opposite party No.3 in local daily
newspaper "Sambad" on 23.04.2015 inviting applications for admissions
into B.Ed. course for the academic Session 2015-2017.
Clause-3 of the Information Brochure to the said
advertisement deals with eligibility criteria for the candidates seeking
admission to the B.Ed. course. Clause-3.12 deals with eligibility criteria
for in-service candidates. The petitioner had filed the writ petition
assailing the said Clause-3.12 of the Information Brochure, which reads
as follows:-
" 3.12 Inservice Candidates: There will be no Entrance Test for In-service Candidates. Eligibility: ï‚· General candidates having 50% marks and reserved category i.e. SC,ST,OBC/SEBC, PH having 45% marks in aggregate, either in Bachelor's Degree and /or in the Master's Degree or any other qualification equivalent thereto are eligible to apply. xx xx xx"
It was the case of the petitioner before the writ Court that
the requirement of minimum 50% of marks in graduation or Master's
degree for taking admission in B.Ed. course for general in-service
candidates and minimum 45% of marks for the reserved category in-
service candidates is not only illegal, but also contrary to the guidelines
issued by N.C.E.R.T. Requirement of minimum percentage of marks as
stated above is also arbitrary, unreasonable and violative of Article 14 of
the Constitution of India. The same cannot be made applicable to the in-
service candidates. Such a restriction, if insisted upon, many of the in-
service candidates like that of the appellant cannot take admission in the
teachers' training course and will face termination in service. There is
also no object sought to be achieved by imposing such a restriction.
(3.) It is contended in the writ petition that in previous years, no such condition (either for direct or for in-service candidates) was imposed
for taking admission into the B.Ed. course. Further, the condition of
minimum percentage of marks for admission into the B. Ed. course for
the in-service candidates is illegal as there is no such stipulation in the
statutory rules for appointment to the post of Trained Graduate
Teachers. Hence, it was prayed to quash the Clause-3.12 of the
Information Brochure for the Session 2015-2017 issued by the TE &
SCERT, Odisha, Bhubaneswar and for a declaration not to make it
applicable to the in-service candidates.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.