GOVERNOR Vs. CORPORATION OF CALCUTTA
LAWS(CAL)-1949-3-13
HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
Decided on March 30,1949

GOVERNOR-GENERAL IN COUNCIL Appellant
VERSUS
CORPORATION OF CALCUTTA Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) The appellant, Dominion of India, representing the East Indian Railways, (formerly Bengal Assam Railway) appeals to this Court under Section 141, Calcutta Municipal Act III [3] of 1923 (hereinafter called the Act) against an order dated 30th June 1947, passed by Mr. R. N. Ray, learned Small Cause Court Judge, Sealdah, District 24 Parganas, whereby he dismissed an appeal against the order of the second Deputy Executive Officer, Corporation of Calcutta, dated 11th April 1946, under Section 140 of the Act in respect of the assessment of Premises No. 52, Gopal Chandra Chatterjee Road.
(2.) The B. A. Railway (Bengal Assam Railway) was the owner and occupier of premises No. 52, Gopal Chandra Chatterjee Road, measuring 83 Bighag, 9 Kottahs 6 chhataks and 14Sq ft., and was paying Rs. 3004-12-0 per annum on account of municipal rates and taxes to the Corporation of Calcutta, hereinafter called the Corporation.
(3.) By a memorandum, Ex. 4, the B. A. Railway let out to the Civil Supply Department the aforesaid premises for one year subject to further extensions, as may be agreed upon; the relevant provision runs as follows: "2. The Civil Supply Department shall be liable to pay to the Bengal Assam Railway Administration a sum of Rs. 60,096-4-0 per annum on account of rent for occupation of the above land. The Civil Supply Departments shall also pay a sum of Rs. 3004-12-0 per annum on account of Municipal tax which the Railway Administration is paying to the Calcutta Corporation. The Civil Supply Department shall be (sic) also pay other taxes or ancillary charges which the Railway Administration may have to pay to any local authorities or any other body in connection with the said plot of land and/or structures thereon." It is now admitted that thereafter the Civil Supply Department erected certain godowns and other structures at its own cost and for its own use. This is also supported by the uncontradicted evidence adduced by the appellant.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.