JUDGEMENT
ARINDAM SINHA, J -
(1.) The Court:-This arbitration petition is for appointment of Arbitrator.
(2.) Mr.Dutt, learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioner in this arbitration petition for appointment of arbitrator. He draws
attention to letter dated 6th September, 2017 written by Presiding
Arbitrator informing that the Tribunal decided to terminate
proceeding in terms of provision under sub-section (3) of section 32
in Arbitration and Conciliation Act , 1996. On query from Court Mr.
Dutt submits, this was by reason of one of the arbitrators not being
available. He then draws attention to letter dated 12th April, 2017
written by his client in response to respondents' request for waiver
under sub-section (5) of section 12 to submit, his client did not
waive. Hence, his client is before Court for appointment of arbitrator
because agreed procedure has not been able to secure the
appointment.
(3.) Ms. Banerjee, learned advocate appears on behalf of respondents and submits, there be appointed retired gazetted officers
of Eastern Railway, for a panel of names she is ready with. She
submits, this panel was not made over to petitioner since petitioner
did not take any steps. She hands over the panel to Mr. Dutt.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.