JUDGEMENT
ARINDAM SINHA, J -
(1.) This arbitration petition has been made invoking provisions of sub-sections (6) and (6A) under section 11 , Arbitration and
Conciliation Act , 1996.
(2.) Mr. Dutt, learned advocate appeared on behalf of petitioner and submitted, there is existing arbitration agreement contained in
agreement dated 7th December, 1998 between his client and respondent.
Respondent's father on having decided to develop his property, this
agreement was entered into by his client, as developer. Apart from the
agreement in respect of development of subject matter of it, parties had
agreed as a term in said agreement, that which is as follows:-
"22 (vi) In case in future the Landlord shall be desirous of developing the remaining part of the said premises then and in such event, the Developer shall have the first preference to act as Developer."
(3.) His client came to know respondent is desirous of developing remaining part of the premises, in breach of above agreed term. Said
agreement contains arbitration agreement under clause 16 therein. As
such, there is existing arbitration agreement, for referring disputes
arisen. His client by letter dated 8th June, 2018 had notified reference of
disputes and nominated its arbitrator. Respondent not having nominated
his arbitrator within thirty days therefrom, his client is before Court for
appointment of nominee arbitrator of respondent, for the arbitrators to
then appoint third arbitrator and proceed with the reference.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.