JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) This is an application for extension of time to file written statement. The Writ of Summons was served on 18th February, 2017, which is an
admitted position. Records reveal that even prior to being served with the Writ of
Summons the defendant no. 2 appeared in an interlocutory application filed by
the plaintiff and contested the same.
(2.) Subsequent to the service of the Writ of Summons, the defendant no. 2 took out an application under the provisions of Section 8 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act , 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the 1996 Act) for referring the
disputes involved in the suit to arbitration. The said application was initially
dismissed for default then restored and was finally disposed of by an order dated
12th July, 2017.
(3.) The defendant no. 2 thereafter did not enter appearance in the suit nor did he file his written statement. The suit, thereafter was transferred to the
list of "Undefended Suit" and was tried out as an "Undefended Suit". The
plaintiff's first witness was partly examined. Before the examination of plaintiff's
first witness was over, the defendant no. 2 filed this application on 12th
September, 2019. This application got dismissed on 7th November, 2019. A
restoration application was filed to restore this application. The said restoration
application has, however, been allowed by an order dated 11th December, 2019.
The defendant no. 2 in the meantime served a copy of his written statement upon
the plaintiff which fact is not disputed.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.