UNIVERSAL CONSORTIUM OFENGINEERS (P) LTD. Vs. STATE OF WEST BENGAL
LAWS(CAL)-2019-2-139
HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
Decided on February 18,2019

Universal Consortium Ofengineers (P) Ltd. Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF WEST BENGAL Respondents

JUDGEMENT

DIPANKAR DATTA,J. - (1.) The writ petitions and the civil revisional applications under consideration (hereafter the 'said matters', wherever referred to jointly) were assigned to the Division Bench presided over by one of us (Dipankar Datta, J.) by an order of the Hon'ble the Chief Justice dated August 23, 2018. Subsequently, a writ appeal [FMA 1475 of 2018] arising out of W.P. 1248 (W) of 2017 upon being listed before a Division Bench presided over by the Hon'ble the Chief Justice, it was submitted on behalf of the appearing parties that W.P. 1248 (W) of 2017 itself had been assigned to a Division Bench. Hearing such submission, an order dated November 19, 2018 was passed directing such appeal to be placed before the presiding judge of this Bench resulting in listing thereof together with the said matters.
(2.) Assignment of the said matters by the Hon'ble the Chief Justice ensued because of an order dated March 7, 2014 passed by a learned Judge of this Court in C.O. 2440 of 2011 (Kamala Properties Limited Vs. Miss Suchismita Roy and ors.). Noticing the divergence of opinion expressed by several single Judges, two on one side holding that the remedy made available by the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (hereafter the CP Act) to a purchaser having a grievance against a promoter is excluded in view of the West Bengal Building (Regulation of Promotion of Construction and Transfer by Promoters) Act, 1993 (hereafter the Building Act), and one on the other holding to the contrary, His Lordship referred the said revisional application to the Hon'ble the Chief Justice for decision by a larger bench.
(3.) Upon the said matters being posted for hearing, it appeared to us that no question of law had been formulated for our answer. However, from an order dated September 21, 2016 passed by a coordinate bench, to which the said matters had been assigned previously, it appeared that Their Lordships had expressed as follows: "In all these petitions, the main question involved is as to whether the fora constituted under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 have jurisdiction over disputes between promoters/developers and purchasers of residential buildings or flats, having regard to the provisions of the West Bengal Building (Regulation of Promotion of Construction and Transfer by Promoters) Act". ;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.