JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Invoking Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, this criminal
revision has been brought before this Court by one of the accused for quashing
of the impugned complaint under Sections 494/120B of the Indian Penal Code
against him, which is now pending before the Learned Judicial Magistrate, 4th
Court, Howrah.
(2.) Mr. Biplab Mitra, learned Advocate appearing in support of this
application urged before this Court except the allegations made in the petition
of complaint, no allegation has been made against the petitioner in the initial,
deposition of the complainant and her witnesses recorded under Section 200
of the Code of Criminal Procedure. He further submitted that in connection
with this case the Court directed for an enquiry under Section 202 of the Code
of Criminal Procedure and during such enquiry nothing has been divulged
against the present petitioner. Accordingly, Mr. Mitra submitted, since no case
has been made out, the Learned Magistrate should not have issued process
against the present petitioner and the case against her is liable to be quashed.
(3.) In support of his contention, Mr. Mitra relied on the following
decisions, viz., (i) Ram Biraji Devi & Anr. v. Umesh Kumar Singh & Anr.,
reported in (2006)2 C Cr LR (SC) 118, (ii) Sankar Finance & Investments v.
State of Andhra Pradesh & Ors., reported in (2008)3 SCC (Cr) 558, (iii) Nirmaljit
Singh Hoon v. State of West Bengal & Anr., reported in 1973 SCC (Cr) 521
and (iv) National Small Industries Corporation Ltd. v. State (NCT of Delhi) &
Ors., reported in (2009)1 SCC (Cr) 513.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.