NIRMALENDU SAHA Vs. SURI MUNICIPALITY & ORS.
LAWS(CAL)-1998-8-52
HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
Decided on August 21,1998

Nirmalendu Saha Appellant
VERSUS
Suri Municipality And Ors. Respondents

JUDGEMENT

S.B. Sinha, J. - (1.) This writ application depicts a sorry state of affairs. The petitioner as far back as in 1989 filed applications for grant of water connection to his premises holding No. 137 of Ward No. 12 of Suri Municipality. The said application was filed pursuant to a notice inviting applications in prescribed form. The petitioner had not been given such water connection. The petitioner has averred that the respondents have arbitrarily sanctioned water connection to some applicants who had filed application after the petitioner without following any norms whatsoever.
(2.) It appears that certain resolutions had been adopted on 29.12.1990 and 28.1.91 as contained in Annexure C and C-l whereby applications for grant of water connection by other persons had been allowed. The petitioner filed the writ application claiming inter alia following reliefs: "(a) A writ in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondents and each one of them to accord sanction of water connection to his premises being holding No. 137 at Ward No. 12 Suri Municipality forthwith upon taking a deposit of usual amount of Rs. 1900/- from your petitioner; (b) A writ in the nature of Certiorary directing the respondents to transmit and authenticate the relevant records to this case before the Hon'ble High Court so that conscionable justice can be done;"
(3.) By an order dated 8.2.91 an interim order was passed by this Court that without considering the case of the petitioner no water connection would be given to the petitioner without the leave of the Court. It is stated that despite the said order no connection had been granted in the premises of the petitioner. From the order sheet dated 22.3.98 it appears the petitioner filed certain documents. On such submissions respondents were asked to take the decision. Such decision had not yet been taken. This lacadisical attitude and callousness on the part of the respondent Municipality, which is a local authority and carries on public utility services cannot but be deprecated. In terms of Section 63(f) of the Bengal Municipal Act, the Municipality has an obligatory duty to make reasonable and adequate provisions inter alia in respect of ensuring wholesomeness of water supply for domestic purpose. Section 226 appearing in Chapter 15 of para 6 of the said Act under the heading Civil Services reads as follows: "Part-VI Civil Services Ch. XV (Water-supply) 226. The Municipality to provide water-supply-(l) it shall be the duty of every municipality to provide a supply of wholesome water for the domestic use of inhabitants. (2) the water for domestic use in excess of such standard as may be determined by the Board and supply of water for non-domestic user may be charged at such scale of fees order as may be prescribed. (3) the Board for the purpose of measuring or recording the quantity of water concerned, may provide for devices on attachment of meter the premises or adopt a higher pay calculation by size or number of Ferrule's through which the supply is made or any other method or measurement or recording in such manner and in accordance with the procedure as may be prescribed.";


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.