AJIT KUMAR AGARWALLA Vs. UNION OF INDIA
LAWS(CAL)-1998-2-16
HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
Decided on February 20,1998

AJIT KUMAR AGARWALLA Appellant
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA Respondents

JUDGEMENT

Vinod Kumar Gupta, J. - (1.) The two petitioners claimed to be associated with Terai Tea Company Ltd., Terai Overseas Ltd., and East Indian Produce Limited and several other companies. The petitioners have their residence at No. 5, Lower Loudon Street, Calcutta. They also reside at 2nd Mile, Sevoke Road, Siliguri. The registered office of Terai Tea Company Limited is situated at 11, Government place, (East), Calcutta.
(2.) On 15th May, 1996 at about 7.10 A.M., a team of Customs officers conducted search and seizure operations at the residential premises of the petitioners at 2nd Mile, Sevoke Road, Siliguri. The search and seizure operations were conducted purportedly on the basis of the search warrant issued in terms of Section 105 of the Customs Act. During the course of search and seizure operations certain documents were seized and taken away by the officers of the team which was responsible for conducting the search and seizure operations.
(3.) The only relief which the petitioners seek in this petition is that this Court declare the aforesaid search of the petitioner's premises and the seizure of documents therefrom as illegal and being violative of Section 105 of the Customs Act, 1962. Section 105 of the Customs Act read as under :- "Power to search premises. (1) If the Assistant Collector of Customs, or in any area adjoining the land frontier or the coast of India an officer of Customs specially empowered by name in this behalf by the Board, has reason to believe that any goods liable to confiscation, or any documents or things which in his opinion will be useful for or relevant to any proceeding under this Act, are secreted in any place, he may authorise any officer of Customs to search or may himself search for such goods, documents or things. (2) The provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 (5 of 1898), relating to searches shall, so far as may be, apply to searches under this Section subject to the modification that Sub-section (5) of Section 165 of the said Code shall have effect as if for the word "Magistrate", wherever it occurs, the words "Collector of Customs" were substituted.";


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.