VEGA TRADING CORPORATION Vs. SHANTILAL RAMPURIA
LAWS(CAL)-1998-2-12
HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
Decided on February 16,1998

VEGA TRADING CORPORATION Appellant
VERSUS
SHANTILAL RAMPURIA Respondents

JUDGEMENT

S.Narayan, J. - (1.) - After a protracted litigation for over 37 years in two spells the parties have now joined issue with regard to identity of the demised premises under section 47 of the Code of Civil Procedure in Miscellaneous Case No. 12 of 1989 arising out of an execution proceeding being Execution case No. 103 of 1990 which relates to Ejectment Suit No. 650 of 1972. After the first phase of litigation between the parties ended with disposal of Ejectment suit No. 103 of 1990, the next one started with Ejectment Suit No. 650 of 1972 which went up to the Supreme Court where the plaintiff/decree-holder was ultimately favoured with a decree of ejectment against the judgment-debtor/petitioner with respect to the demised premises. The judgment-debtor asserted that the decree was incapable of execution for want of proper and specific identity on the spot.
(2.) Straight-way coming to the legal proposition, I am to extract the provision contained in Order 20 Rule 9 of the CPC which is as follows:- "R. 9. Decree for recovery of immovable property:- Where the subject matter of the suit is immovable property, the decree shall contain a description of such property sufficient to identify the same, and where such property can be identified by boundaries or by numbers in a record of settlement or survey the decree shall specify such boundaries or numbers."
(3.) Emphasis may be put of the legal requirement that the description of the immovable property must be given as such, which would be sufficient to identify the same. Added to it, if the property could be identified by boundaries, the decree was required to specify such boundaries as well. In this context, what is to be found in the instant case is that the demised premises has been described in the relevant decree in the manner as given below, which, of course, also records the boundaries of the property. "Description of the premises 1. One office room being room No. 3 on the Second Floor of Premises No. 8/1, 8A, 8B, 8C Lal Bazar St. Calcutta containing an area of about 3000 sq. ft. and bounded on the north by Lal Bazar Street on the south by a godown occupied by the Central Bank of India on the east by a passage in the said premises and on the west by passage and staircase in the said premises. 2. One Darwan's room on the roof of the Premises No. 8/1, 8A, 8B and 8C, Lal Bazar Street, Calcutta containing an area of about 40 sq. f. bounded on the north by roof of the said building on the south by roof of the said building on the east by a Darwan's room and on the west by a Darwan's room." ;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.