A L GOEL Vs. PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK
LAWS(CAL)-1988-7-26
HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
Decided on July 01,1988

A.L.GOEL Appellant
VERSUS
PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK Respondents

JUDGEMENT

Umesh Chandra Banerjee, J. - (1.) The focal point for consideration in this matter is the order of premature retirement issued against the petitioner.
(2.) Dr. Mukherjee appearing in support of the petition challenged the order of premature retirement on three (3) counts namely :- (i) Violation of natural justice ; (ii) Order of premature retirement amounts to a stigma in the service record of the petitioner consequently a penalty and (iii) Order of premature retirement shows bias and mala fide.
(3.) Apart from the three counts noted above, Dr. Mukherjee also contended that regulation 19 is violative of Article 14 & 16 of the Constitution being arbitrary and by reason of confirment of unguided powers onto the authority.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.