ADMINISTRATOR GENERAL OF WEST BENGAL Vs. IN MATTER OF BASUDEB MUKHERJEE
LAWS(CAL)-1958-3-35
HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
Decided on March 18,1958

ADMINISTRATOR GENERAL OF WEST BENGAL Appellant
VERSUS
In Matter Of Basudeb Mukherjee Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) These two Rules were issued under an order of the Chief Justice on 11-3-1958. By one Rule Barindra Kumar Ghose was directed to attend before this Court in person on this day 18-3-1958 and to show cause either in person or by Advocate why he should not be committed or otherwise dealt with for contempt of this Court committed by addressing and causing to be delivered to the Chief Justice at his private residence a letter dated 8-3-1958 and thereby attempting to interfere with the course of justice in Suit No. 1947 of 1950, Administrator General of West Bengal V/s. Basudeb Mukherji pending in the Court of Mitter, J. By the other Rule Sambhu Nath Mukherji of 22 Park Lane, Calcutta was directed to appear before this Court in person on this day 18-3-1958 and show cause either in person or by Advocate why he should not be committed or otherwise dealt with for aiding and abetting Sri Barindra Kumar Ghose, Editor, Daily Basumati, in committing contempt of this Court by carrying and delivering at the private residence of the Chief Justice on 8-3-1958 a letter written by the said Barindra Kumar Ghose and also for committing contempt of this Court himself by verbally asking the Chief Justice to intervene as Chief Justice in Suit No. 1947 of 1950 - Administrator General of West Bengal V/s. Basudeb Mukherji and to induce Mitter, J. to hold up judgment in the case.
(2.) Xxx xxx xxx
(3.) Both Barindra Kumar Ghose and Sambhunath Mukherji have appeared before us in accordance with the direction in the Rules. Affidavits affirmed by them have been filed in Court before us. Barindra Kumar Ghose in his affidavit tenders "a humble and unqualified apology for writing and addressing the letter set out in the judgment." He adds therein that the letter was written without reflection on his part and without realisation of the nature of the act that it was never his intention to obstruct administration of justice, that for the time being he was overwhelmed by his sympathy for Basudeb Mukherji and the sufferings of his family and was actuated by no intention of committing any wrongful act. He repeats thereafter his unqualified apology.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.