RASIKLAL CHUNILAL BHYANI Vs. MD SULTANUL HAQUE
LAWS(CAL)-2018-9-35
HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
Decided on September 11,2018

Rasiklal Chunilal Bhyani Appellant
VERSUS
Md Sultanul Haque Respondents

JUDGEMENT

Biswajit Basu, J. - (1.) The appellant and the respondent have reached at compromise between themselves and filed the present application being CAN 7236 of 2018. The application has been signed by the appellant and the respondent as also their respective advocates. Let the appeal be disposed of on the basis of the terms and conditions contained in the paragraph 4 of the application which are set out hereinbelow :- "4. That the Appellants and Respondents as Joint Petitioners herein above settled this dispute relating to the matter in issued on the following :- Terms and Conditions The above mentioned F.A. No. 271 of 2016 (C.A.N.) No. 5420 of 2016) is disposed of on compromise agreed between the parties set out hereinbelow :- a) The Appellants agree to pay rent of Rs. 3,000/- (Rupees three thousand) with effect from the month of July 2018 Respondent/Opposite Party herein. b) The Respondent/Opposite Party permit the Appellants to use the bath room, urinal and privy along with the tenanted room. c) The Compromise Petition is treated as a part of the Decree to be passed in F.A. No. 271/2016. d) This Compromise made between us is out of over own volition, and not influenced by any person or fact or under duress or cocecion."
(2.) In view of the aforesaid, F.A. No. 271 of 2016 is disposed of, on the basis of terms and conditions contained at Paragraph 4 of the application forming the said terms and conditions a part of the decree.
(3.) In view of the aforesaid, CAN 5420 of 2016 is also stand disposed of. Decree be drawn up accordingly in F.A. No. 271 of 2016.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.