JUDGEMENT
I.P.MUKERJI,J. -
(1.) This case raises a most important and interesting question of law. Suppose the law lays down that for sale of an immovable property stamp
duty at a particular rate is payable. Now, this sale may be effected by one
instrument or by several instruments, cumulatively having the same
effect. What is the stamp duty that is the chargeable and payable under
the Indian Stamp Act , 1899 read with the relevant Rules, on each
document or on all the documents together?
(2.) The dispute in the case has arisen out of an agreement for sale of an immovable property. As is usual in land transactions, by an agreement
for sale dated 12th May, 2010, the appellant No.1 proposed to purchase
premises No.119, Park Street, Kolkata - 700016, from the Ghosh family
at a total consideration of Rs.12 crores subject to a lease hold interest of
a lessee therein arising out of a lease dated 24th January, 1979.
On or about 12th May, 2010 the said instrument was presented for
registration before the Additional Registrar of Assurance II. The
Respondent No.5 assessed the market value of the property at
Rs.30,34,21,962/- and stamp duty payable thereon as Rs.2,12,39,548/-.
The petitioner No.1 paid 50% of the duty.
(3.) One half share of the premises was owned by four members of the Ghosh family, Shima, Jyotirmay, Avijit and Surojit whereas the other half share
was owned by Jayeeta Singha Roy.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.