BHARAT SHIVJI Vs. STATE
LAWS(CAL)-1987-3-1
HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
Decided on March 30,1987

BHARAT SHIVJI Appellant
VERSUS
STATE Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) THIS revisional application raises an important question of law.
(2.) BHARAT Shivji Sethia and Madhusudhan Deb Chand Sethia, the two petitioners before us, were tried before a learned Metropolitan magistrate- on the following charges : "madhusudhan Deb Chand Sethia. That you on or about dated 15. 12. 59 contravened the condition of the customs Clearance Permit and the Bond and purchased or otherwise acquired from Sri Nicholas Nesekar the said Demlar Benz Mercedes Car bearing Registration No,. WBE 5973 and the terms and conditions of the said Customs Clearance permit as well as of the Bond were known to you from before and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 5 of the Imports and Exports (Control) Act,. 1947 and within my cognizance. " "bharat Shiviji Sethia. That you on or about dated 15. 12. 59 contravened the condition of the Customs Clearance- Perm it and the Bond and purchased or otherwise acquired from Sri Nicholas Nesekar the said Demlar Benz Mercedes Car bearing Registration No. WBE 5973 and the terms and conditions of the said Customs Clearance permit as well as of the Bond were known to you from before and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 5 of the Imports and Exports (Control) Act, 1947 and within my cognizance. " " Madhusudhan Deb Chand Sethia and Bharat Shivij Sethia that you on or about December 1959 and onward at Calcutta agreed with Nicholas Nesekar and other to do an illegal act to wit, to contravene the conditions of Customs Clearance Permit no. 0968383/57/ccp/hq\moo dated 2. 1. 59 exceuted by Nicholas neskar and to purchase the Demlar Benz Mercedes Motor Car, bearing Registration No, WBE 5973 and improted by Nicholas nesekar, by illegal means viz. by advancing Rs. 33,000/- as the consideration of the said car and made correspondence in the name of Nicholas Nesekar, even after his departure on 20. 12. 59 from India for redemption of the said bond, executed by Sri Nesekar and possessed the car in violation of the terms and conditions of the bond, which were known, to you and thereby committed an offence punishable under section 120b I. P. C. , read with Section 5 of the Imports and Exports (Control) Act and within my cognizance. "
(3.) ON conclusion of the trial they were convicted of both the charges. For their conviction under Section 5 of the Imports and exports (Control) Act, 1947 ('act' for short), each of them was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for one year and to a fine of rs. 2,000/-, in default to rigorous imprisonment for three months more, while for their conviction under Section 120b, Indian Penal code, read with Section 5 of the Act, each of them was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for six months and to a fine of Rs. 2,000/-, in default to rigorous imprisonment for two months more, the sentences running concurrently. The learned Magistrate also passed an order for confiscation of the car to the Government.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.