SENIOR STATION SUPERINTENDENT TN CHARGE OF PURULIA ELECTRIC SUPPLY Vs. RADHA DEBI SARAOGI
LAWS(CAL)-1977-2-23
HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
Decided on February 15,1977

SENIOR STATION SUPERINTENDENT TN CHARGE OF PURULIA ELECTRIC SUPPLY Appellant
VERSUS
RADHA DEBI SARAOGI Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) THE opposite party No. 1 Smt. Radha Debi Saraogi is a consumer of electricity under the petitioner. For non-payment of electricity charges amounting to Rs. 601. 94 paise the supply of electricity to the meter standing in the name of the said opposite party, was disconnected. The opposite party No. 4 claiming to the a tenant of the opposite party No. 2, filed an application under section 31 of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred as the act) before the rent controller, Purulia praying for issue of process against the petitioner and the opposite parties Nos. 1, 2 and 3 as also for a direction on the petition for immediate restoration of the supply of electricity. The petitioner was impleaed as opposite party No. 4 in the aforesaid application which was registered as Misc. case (R. C. Case) No. 3 of 1975-76.
(2.) BY an order dated 4. 9. 75 passed by the Rent Controller the petitioner was asked immediately to restore supply of electricity which had been disconnected. The petitioner wrote a letter dated 13. 9. 75 to the Rent Controller, namely the opposite party No. 5 in this application pleading that on receipt of the outstanding arrears, the reconnection charges and the security deposit from the opposite party No. 1 the supply would be restored and prayed for necessary instructions to be issued to the parties concerned.
(3.) BY an order dated 11. 11. 75 the petitioner was directed to restore the supply immediately irrespective of the departmental Rules or orders of the west Bengal State Electricity Board. The petitioner made a further representation to the Rent Controller praying for review of the order dated 11. 11. 75. By another order dated 2. 12,75 the petitioner was asked to restore the supply by 17. 12. 75 failing which the petitioner was threatened with a prosecution under section 188 of the Indian Penal Code. The legality of the order dated 4. 9. 75 ordering the petitioner to restore the supply of electricity and the subsequent orders dated 11. 11. 75 arid 2. 12. 75 have been challenged in this rule.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.