UNITED BANK OF INDIA LTD Vs. A T ALI HUSSAIN AND CO A FIRM
LAWS(CAL)-1977-12-3
HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
Decided on December 20,1977

UNITED BANK OF INDIA LTD. Appellant
VERSUS
A.T.ALI HUSSAIN AND CO., A FIRM Respondents

JUDGEMENT

M.M.Dutt, J. - (1.) This appeal is at the instance of the plaintiff United Bank of India Limited and it arises out of 6 suit for recovery of money.
(2.) The case of the plaintiff was that on Jan. 14, 1957, the defendant No. 2, the Union Bank of India Limited presented to the plaintiff bank, a cheque for Rupees 5,200 bearing date Jan. 11, 1957 purported to have been drawn by the Metal Alloy Co. Private Ltd., a constituent of the plaintiff bank, in favour of the defendant No. 1, A. T. Alihussain & Co., and crossed "not negotiable and account payee only". The plaintiff bank, acting under the mistaken belief that the said cheque had in fact been duly signed by the said Metal Alloy Co., paid the said sum of Rs. 5,200 to the defendant Union Bank by debiting the C/D Account of the said constituent The signature on the said cheque and all other writings appearing thereon had, since transpired, been forged and no one on behalf of the company had signed or drawn the same. The forgery of the said cheque along with two other cheques were the subject-matter of a criminal proceeding and in that proceeding one Prodyot Kumar Ghosh and another were convicted. On Feb. 22, 1957, the plaintiff, after making necessary enquiry, came to know that the said cheques were forged and the amounts covered by them were obtained by fraud on the plaintiff who paid the same by mistake. Thereafter, on March 4, 1957, the plaintiff made a payment of Rs. 14,800 being the total amount covered by the aforesaid three cheques including the cheque in question to its said constituent, the Metal Alloy Co. on demand being made therefor. It was claimed by the plaintiff that the defendants Nos. 1 and 2 were liable for the amount covered by the cheque in question, that is, Rs. 5,200 paid by the plaintiff as aforesaid. Accordingly, the plaintiff prayed for the recovery of the said sum of Rupees 5,200 from the defendants.
(3.) The suit was contested by both the defendants. The case of the defendant No. 1 was that certain persons alleging themselves to be the representatives of the Metal Alloy Co. Pvt. Ltd., of Asansol came to the defendant's show room on Jan. 13, 1957 in order to ascertain the price of certain tube-well materials and after such talks and ascertainment of the price, they came on the next day with a cheque for Rs. 5,200 and the defendant, in the ordinary course of business, entered the order placed by them in the order book The defendant, acting in good faith, sent the cheque to its banker, namely, the Union Bank of India Limited for collection, and after the cheque had been encashed delivered the goods to those persons on Jan. 15, 1957. It was asserted by the defendant that it had acted in good faith having no reason to suspect that the cheque was forged, and on receipt of an intimation from the defendant bank, it parted with valuable properties and were not, therefore, in any way liable for the alleged loss suffered toy the plaintiff. It was contended by the defendant that the plaintiff and Its constituent had acted negligently and carelessly, and that accordingly, the plaintiff was precluded from recovering the money from the defendant;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.