TAPAN DEY & ANR Vs. ARUN MULLICK & ANR
LAWS(CAL)-2017-8-172
HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
Decided on August 25,2017

Tapan Dey And Anr Appellant
VERSUS
Arun Mullick And Anr Respondents

JUDGEMENT

Sahidullah Munshi, J. - (1.) This revisional application is directed against order no.66-A and 67 dated 14th July, 2016, passed by the learned 10th Judge, City Civil Court at Calcutta in Title Suit No.1253 of 2009 rejecting the petitioners' application for amendment of plaint under Order VI, Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
(2.) The background fact on which the petitioners have filed an application for amendment of the plaint is as follows : 1. During pendency of the suit the defendant no.1, having wrongfully and illegally transferred and conveyed his undivided 1/3rd share in the suit premises to a stranger (now defendant no.2) the plaintiff filed an application under Order I, Rule 10(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure for addition of the said transferee (defendant no.2) and such prayer of the plaintiff was allowed; 2. Consequent to such addition of defendant no.2, an application for amendment was also made by the plaintiff and vide order dated 14th June, 2011, such application for amendment was allowed;
(3.) The plaintiff amended the plaint and amended plaint was filed on 20th June, 2011. Subsequent to the said amendment, issues were framed on 1st September, 2014 and a date was fixed for hearing of the suit on 17th September, 2014;;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.