AMAR NATH GUPTA Vs. KOLKATA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
LAWS(CAL)-2017-5-83
HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
Decided on May 11,2017

AMAR NATH GUPTA Appellant
VERSUS
KOLKATA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Respondents

JUDGEMENT

HARISH TANDON, J. - (1.) The important and interesting point has arisen in the instant writ petition pertaining to the meaning and interpretation of the word "building" appearing in Rule 73 of the Kolkata Municipal Corporation Building Rules, 2009 in the context of the peculiar and admitted facts.
(2.) Admittedly, the respondent no. 7 is the owner of flat no. B-3 at 3rd floor and top floor at premise no. 530, Parnasree Pally and is also the owner of the adjacent building situated at the northern side being premise no. 522, Parnasree Pally, Kolkata. Both the premises are distinct and separate and demarcated by the boundary walls.
(3.) The premises no. 530, Parnasree Pally, Kolkata is developed by the owner on the basis of a sanctioned plan dated August 4, 2004 by constructing four storied building. The said newly constructed building comprised of several flats earmarked by numbers and have been sold to the petitioners and the private respondents. Each of those persons are exclusively possessioning, occupying and owing separate flats along with common rights in the common areas and facilities.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.