JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) The present application under Article 227 of the Constitution is
directed against the judgement and order dated 14-05-2004 passed by the
learned Additional District Judge and Judge, 1st Fast Track Court,
Chandernagore, in Misc. Appeal No. 92 of 1995 thereby affirming the
judgement and order dated 09-02-1985 passed by the learned 1st Court of
Munsif, Chandernagore, in Misc. Case No. 49 of 1989.
(2.) The opposite parties as pre-emptors filed an application under
Section 8 of the West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955 as against the present
petitioner as opposite party No. 1 and one Gopa! Chandra Das (since
deceased)', the predecessor of the proforma opposite parties herein. lt
was claimed in the said application under Section 8 of the W.B.L.R. Act
that the case plot being No. 1173 measuring 92 sataks originally belonged
to Ashutosh Das and Dasorathi Das to the extent of 8 anna share each.
Ashutosh Das died leaving 3 sons, namely, Santiram Das, Gopal Chandra
Das and Gour @ Gobinda Chandra Das. Among the heirs of Ashutosh Das
and Dasorathi Das, there had been a partition of the case plot. The
demarcated portion of the property was allotted in the manner is described
in the petition. Santiram got 'A' schedule property, Gopal got B' schedule
property, Gour @ Gobinda got 'C' schedule property and Ananta Bala Das
got 'D' schedule property. The opposite party No. 1 got demarcated 'C'
schedule land of the said case plot to the east of the 'B' schedule property,
i.e. the portion of Sri Gopal Chandra Das. The opposite party Nos. 2 and 3,
i.e. the sons of the opposite party No. 1 got 'A' schedule property, i.e. the
portion of the said Santiram Das by way of bequest from Panchubala Dasi,
the wife of the said Santiram Das, which is adjacent west to the 'B' schedule
land of said Gopal Chandra Das, the predecessor of the proforma opposite
parties.
(3.) On 18-10-1986, the said Gopal Chandra Das without serving any
notice to the opposite parties sold out his share of the plot and the deed
was finally registered on 21-11-1989. The opposite parties being raiyats
possessing the adjacent land of the land which was transferred by the said
deed, filed a pre-emption application.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.