JUDGEMENT
INDRAJIT CHATTERJEE,J. -
(1.) This is an application under Sectgion482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in which the petitioners have prayed for
quashing of the complaint case, being CNS 412129 of 2014, now pending
before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 19th Court, Calcutta, under
Sections 406/420 and Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code.
Before I proceed further, I like to reflect herein the fact as I get from the complainant as told by the learned advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner.
(2.) It was claimed by the complainant/Company, i.e. the opposite party no. 2, that there was an agreement in between that Company and the
accused no.1/co -operative society for supply of 100 Bales of Cotton at the
rate of Rs. 33,600/ - per candy and as the said contract was accepted by the
complainant, the complainant paid a sum of Rs. 79,512/ - to the accused
no.1/Company, i.e. 5% of the total sale value.
(3.) On 09 -12 -2012, the complainant requested the accused persons to issue the delivery note in favour of the transporter of the complainant for
lifting the goods as per that said contract and in terms of the same, the
transporter of the complainant was supposed to lift the material from the
godown of the accused persons at Akola in Maharashtra that delivery note
was handed over. Thereafter, unfortunately, some trouble arose in the
factory of the Complainant's Company and there was "Suspension of Work"
for which the complainant was not in a position to lift the materials. The
complainant claimed that the situation was beyond the control of the
complainant to lift the materials from godown of the accused aforesaid and
as such, one letter was written on 24th December, 2013, i.e. after a year of
the agreement, requesting the accused persons to refund the aforesaid
amount as paid to them in advance by treating the agreement for sale as
cancelled. That letter is Annexure P -1 (running page no.18).;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.