SMT. MINOTI HAALDER Vs. SMT. SWAPNA BARAT AND OTHERS
LAWS(CAL)-2016-9-198
HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
Decided on September 01,2016

Smt. Minoti Haalder Appellant
VERSUS
Smt. Swapna Barat And Others Respondents

JUDGEMENT

Harish Tandon, J. - (1.) Mr. Sibasis Ghose, learned advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner, prays for dispensation of service of the revisional application upon the opposite party nos. 2 to 7.
(2.) Such prayer is allowed. The service upon the opposite party nos. 2 to 7 is dispensed with at the risk of the petitioner. The plaintiff/opposite party no. 1, who lodged caveat, is represented.
(3.) The instant revisional application arises from an order dated 10th June, 2016 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Baruipur in Miscellaneous Appeal No. 12 of 2014 affirming the order of the Trial Court, by which an application under Order 39, Rule 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure was rejected.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.