JUDGEMENT
R.K.BAG,J. -
(1.) The petitioners have prayed for quashing of the criminal
proceeding of CNS/Case No. 406021 of 2014 pending before the court of
learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 20th Court, Calcutta by filing this revision
under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
(2.) The backdrop of filing the present revision is as follows: The Opposite Party, M/s. Saasta Farms (hereinafter referred to as the complainant firm)
filed a petition of complaint against the petitioners before the court of
learned Metropolitan Magistrate praying for issuance of process against the
petitioners for the offence punishable under Sections 420/406/120B of the
Indian Penal Code. The petitioner no.1, M/s. Amrit Hatcheries Private
Limited (hereinafter referred to as the accused company) is running
hatchery -cum -poultry firm by purchasing hatching eggs. The petitioner
no.2 is the Managing Director of the accused company and the petitioner
no.3 and the petitioner no.4 are the Directors of the said accused company.
One Mrs. T. Kavita happens to be the proprietor of the complainant firm. It
is alleged in the petition of complaint that pursuant to an agreement
between the complainant firm and the accused company, the complainant
firm started to supply hatching eggs to the hatcheries of the accused
company at different places with effect from the month of July, 2013. It is
further alleged that the complainant firm supplied total quantities of
49,39,310 pieces of egg valued at Rs.1,44,18,442/ - till the month of January, 2014. It is specifically alleged that the accused company did not
make payment of dues of Rs.1,44,19,442/ - to the complainant firm in spite
of repeated requests. As a result, the complainant firm started the criminal
proceeding against the accused company and its Managing Director and
other two Directors on the allegation that they have committed offence
punishable under Sections 420/406/120B of the Indian Penal Code.
(3.) Learned Magistrate took cognizance of the offence on the basis of petition of complaint filed by the complainant firm and issued process
against all the petitioners for the offence punishable under
Sections 420/406/120B of the Indian Penal Code. On October 30, 2014 the
petitioners filed two separate applications before the court of learned
Magistrate one application was filed praying for exemption from personal
appearance before the court under Section 205 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure and another application was filed praying for representing the
accused company through authorized agent under Section 305 of the Code
of Criminal Procedure. The criminal proceeding is under challenge in this
revision.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.