JUDGEMENT
SUDIP AHLUWALIA, J. -
(1.) The Petitioner No. 1, who is a resident of Kalimpong in the
District of Darjeeling is the husband of deceased Mridula Dutta,
while the other two petitioners are his widowed mother and
brother, both residents of 143/1, R.N. Guha Road, P.S. Dum
Dum, Kolkata -74.
(2.) The FIR being Dum Dum P.S. Case No. 596 dated 06.09.2012 was drawn against them on the basis of a complaint filed by the
Opposite Party No. 2 Abhijit Boral, brother of the deceased
Mridula Dutta.
(3.) The gist of the allegations made in the FIR is that the deceased Mridula Dutta (Nee Boral) was married to the petitioner No. 1 on
the 12th of August, 1991. She thereafter shifted to her
matrimonial house at Kalimpong in the District of Darjeeling.
According to the complaint, she was subjected to physical and
mental torture by the members of her in -laws family including
her husband, and some demands of dowry were made to the
complainant. It is also mentioned in the petition of complaint
that the deceased Mridula Dutta was suffering from a prolonged
backbone illness, but that the petitioners particularly her
husband exhibited a callous and casual attitude, and appeared
not to be willing to take up her treatment seriously. They are
also alleged to have demanded money from the complainant's
side for bearing her medical expenses. The complainant allegedly
paid an amount of Rs. 10,000/ - to the petitioner No. 1 to meet
the incidental expenses, but the petitioners abused him for
giving such paltry amount. His wife i.e., deceased Mridula Dutta
was released from "Saviour Clinic" where she had undergone an
operation, on the 21st of July, 2012, after having been admitted
there earlier on the 5th of July. In this connection the allegation
of the complainant is that after being released from the Nursing
Home the deceased was taken to the residence of the Petitioner
Nos. 2 and 3 at 143/1, R.N. Guha Road, P.S. Dum Dum,
Kolkata 74. The complainant with his younger sister visited her
in that house and found that an attendant had been kept to look
after her, but she was not being attended property. The
Petitioners are thereafter alleged to have used rough and filthy
language towards the complainant and his younger sister.
Thereafter it has been alleged that on 30.07.2012 the deceased
was admitted to one 'Jeevan Sathi Old Age Home' under Kalyani
P.S. without informing the complainant or his family. The
petitioner No. 1 is thereafter alleged to have left for his
permanent residence at Kalimpong. On 08.08.2012 the
complainant learnt that his sister has expired in the Old -age -
Home. He has therefore alleged that the petitioners family had
acted callously by sending the victim to an Old -age -Home
instead of a Hospital. He therefore filed the complaint
subsequently which was drawn upon U/Ss. 498A/304A/406
and 34 of the IPC.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.