JUDGEMENT
DEBANGSU BASAK, J. -
(1.) The plaintiff as a stock exchange has sought to recover amounts of default from the defendant as its
member along with interest thereon. According to the plaintiff, the defendant has failed to honour
its obligations under three settlements, namely, 20001148, 20001149 and 20001150.
(2.) The defendant has filed a written statement along with a counter claim. According to the defendant,
the plaintiff ought not to have stopped the trading facilities of the defendant. In any event, the
plaintiff ought to have sold the shares held as securities on March 9, 2001. Taking the value of the
securities available with the plaintiff on account of the defendant as at March 9, 2001 and adjusting
the same against the liabilities of the defendant, the plaintiff is liable to pay the defendant. The
defendant claims such sum along with interest from the plaintiff in its counter claim.
(3.) The plaintiff has filed an additional written statement denying the claims made by the defendant in
the counter claim.
Eight issues were settled by the Order dated February 24, 2016. Such issues are as follows: -
1) Is the plaintiff entitled to decree for a sum of Rs. 60,56,843.41 ?
2) Did or could the defendant have any obligation towards the plaintiff in respect of settlement numbers 2001141 and 2001150 as alleged in paragraphs 12 and 13 of the plaint ?
3) Was the plaintiff obliged to square -off all outstanding trades on 9th March, 2001, as alleged in paragraph 7 of the Written Statement ?
4) Could not the plaintiff square -off all the outstandings in the name of the defendant and adjust the securities including Temporary Cash Margin of Rs. 62,01,000/ - and the Bank Guarantee of Rs. 15,00,000/ - on 9th March, 2001, as alleged in paragraph 27 of the Additional Written Statement of the plaintiff ?
5) Did the plaintiff, in accordance with its rules, bye -laws and regulations, pay any amount to any other recipient member as alleged in paragraph 21 of the plaint ?
6) Is the plaintiff entitled to any interest as claimed ?
7) What relief, if any, is the plaintiff entitled to ?
8) What relief, if any, is the defendant entitled to ?
In support of its claim the plaintiff has disclosed various documents. The plaintiff has examined two
witnesses. The defendant has disclosed various documents. The defendant has produced herself as
the sole witness.
Mr. Moloy Ghosh, learned Senior Advocate appearing for the plaintiff has submitted that, the
defendant in its pleading as well as in his oral evidence has admitted that she was a defaulter in
respect of the three settlements bearing nos. 20001148, 20001149 and 20001150. The net amounts
payable in respect of the three settlements have been admitted by the defendant. What the
defendant disputes, is the adjustment given by the plaintiff in respect of the sale of shares held as
securities on account of the defendant. A member of a stock exchange is required to furnish margin
money. In the present case the defendant had furnished margin money in the nature of cash
deposits, fixed deposits, bank guarantee as well as shares. These securities were adjusted by the
plaintiff on the failure of the defendant to honour her obligations in respect of the three settlement
accounts. She was declared as a defaulter. Upon her being declared as a defaulter and prior to the
Default Settlement Account available with the plaintiff being availed of by the plaintiff, the shares of
the defendant were sold. Such sale had happened in April 2001. The defendant was given credit for
the value of the shares sold in April 2001. Referring to the annexure to the plaint it has been
submitted that, the defendant has been given due credit of all the adjustments that she is entitled to.
After giving such adjustments, Rs.60,56,843.41p. has become due and payable by the defendant to
the plaintiff. The plaintiff is entitled to interest thereon at the rate of 2.5% per month as prescribed
by the bye -laws of the Calcutta Stock Exchange. The bye -laws are binding agreements between the
member and the plaintiff. Therefore, the defendant is liable to pay such agreed rate of interest, at
least up to the date of filing of the suit. For the period after the filing of the suit, the Court may at its
discretion award interest at such rate to the plaintiff as deemed proper.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.