JUDGEMENT
SANKAR ACHARYYA,J. -
(1.) An old criminal appeal relating to homicidal death
of Atul Debnath (victim) which occurred about thirty years back is under
our consideration. The case was initiated on 10.10.1987 at Tufanganj
police station (in short P.S.) at 8:30 p.m. recording the incident of
murder which occurred at about 7:00 p.m. of that date at village Mansai
which is 11 km. away from P.S. as reported against the appellant orally
by Lalit Mohan Debnath, since deceased, the father of the victim and was
reduced to writing by the then officer-in-charge (PW 12) of that P.S.,
under Section 154, Code of Criminal Procedure (in short Cr.P.C.). The
case was investigated by PW 13 and then by PW 17 of Tufanganj P.S. and
the investigation was ended in submitting charge-sheet under Section 302,
Indian Penal Code (in short I,P.C.) against the accused appellant.
(2.) The appellant remains on bail under an order dated 8.11.2005 passed by a coordinate Bench in this appeal. In the trial Court in Sessions Trial
No. 1 (10) 95 corresponding to Sessions Case No. 99/91 leaned Sessions
Judge, Cooch Behar in his judgment dated 28.8.2000 convicted the accused
appellant of the charge under Section 302, I.P.C. and on 29.8.2000
sentenced the accused appellant to suffer rigorous imprisonment for life
and to pay a fine of Rs. 2000/- in default of payment of fine amount to
suffer further rigorous imprisonment for six months. Challenging the said
judgment of conviction and sentence this appeal has been preferred by the
appellant.
(3.) Moot question for our determination is whether the said judgment (hereinafter called as impugned judgment) is liable to be set aside or to
be sustained.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.