JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) This revisional application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure (in short the Code) filed by the petitioners is aimed at quashing the
criminal proceeding being G.R. Case No. 602/04 arising out of Pandaveswar
Police Station (in short P.S.) Case No. 42/04 dated 23.6.04 under Sections
498A/307 of the Indian Penal Code (in short I.P.C.) which is now pending before
the Court of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (hereinafter called
the ACJM), Durgapur.
(2.) Before entering into the merit of the revisional application, it would
be fruitful to mention the facts as disclosed in the First Information Report (in
short FIR) lodged by the wife Chaitali Ghosh, the de facto complainant, who
was not made a party in this revisional application.
(3.) The facts as disclosed in the FIR, in short, is that the de facto
complainant Chaitali Ghosh was married with one Amitava Ghosh, son of
Gourisankar Ghosh of Suri, West Khottabazar on 28.6.99. At the time of
marriage, father of the de facto complainant paid Rs.2 lakhs in cash, gold
ornaments weighing about 20 bhories and other articles and furnitures worth
about Rs. 50.000/- as 'joutuka' in the marriage to the husband party. After
marriage the de facto complainant was staying with her husband in her
matrimonial home. A few months after the marriage, her father-in-law told her to
bring a diamond ring and a scooter for the journey of his son Amitava Ghosh for
his profession. Amitava Ghosh, husband of de facto complainant is a lawyer in
Suri Court. Father of the de facto complainant expressed his inability to pay the
diamond ring and scooter and the said refusal paved the way of torture on de
facto complainant in various ways.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.