JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) This appeal is directed
against an order dated 7th March, 2006
passed by the Hon'ble First Court refusing
an order of injunction restraining the bank
from making any payment under Letters of
Credit dated 23rd November, 2004 and 29th
November, 2004 and also was pleased to
refuse the restraint order against the respondent Nos. 1 to 3 from demanding payment
under the said Letters of Credit. The suit
was filed against the defendants for a decree for perpetual injunction restraining the
defendants and each of them, their servants,
men, agents and assigns from making any
payment under the said Letters of Credit;
the suit was filed against the defendants for
a decree for perpetual injunction restraining the defendants and each of them, their
servants from in any way or the manner
obtaining and/or seeking to obtain payment
under the said Letters of Credit; a decree
for perpetual injunction restraining the defendants from debiting the plaintiffs account
for any amount in excess of Rs. 23.40 lakhs;
declaration that the defendants are not entitled to demand any payment under the said
Letters of Credit.
(2.) An ad-interim order was passed by
the Court on March 23, 2005 restraining the
payment under the said Letters of Credit.
Subsequently, the said order was modified
on 4th May, 2005 and after exchange of the
affidavits the matter was finally disposed of
by the Hon'ble First Court. When His Lordship was pleased to permit the respondent
to obtain payment of the full amount upon
furnishing a Bank Guarantee for the equivalent amount.
(3.) Facts of the case briefly are as follows:-
It was agreed between the parties that the
respondent No. 1 agreed to sell to the petitioner/appellant and the petitioner agreed
to purchase from the respondent No. 1, 340
MT [iron and steel scrap) and 85 MT of re-
rollable rail, scrap on the terms and conditions agreed upon
between the parties. Admittedly, on 23rd November, 2004 and 29th
November, 2004 respondent No. 29, being
the banker of the petitioner issued two Letters of Credit covering the" price of the said
goods. Under the said Letters of Credit, respondent No. 1 is the beneficiary and the
respondent No. 3 is the advising bank. The
said Letters of Credit are subject to UCP 500.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.